MATCH REPORT: Birstall United 0-2 Gedling Miners Welfare

Gedling Miners Welfare made the 64-mile round trip to Leicestershire on Saturday looking to avenge their first loss in eight games last weekend at home to Radford, writes Marc Williams.

Similarly, their hosts, who have made an in-different start to their campaign and sat mid-table, were also looking to bounce back after their most recent result, a 3-1 midweek cup loss to neighbours Kirkby Muxloe.

The game opened in an energetic fashion as neither team shied out of tackles and were extremely combative. Ross McCaughey and goalkeeper Chris Heltorp were on the receiving end of fierce tackles as the tone of the game was evident early on.

The first ten minutes belonged to the home side as they started brightly. Their intricate passing and deft flicks to find feet gave Gedling something to think about as Ashley Way, spearheading Birstall’s attack, showed characteristic protectiveness up front as Steven Brett and Martin Holt looked to settle in the heart of Gedling’s defence.

The first meaningful chance of the game came after just 18 minutes and it went to the visitors but home ‘keeper Elliot Shilliam produced a fantastic double save low down to prevent Jurgen Charlesworth and then Ryan Plummer as both players really should have found the net. However, only 8 minutes later Gedling did take the lead, contrary to the possession statistic that heavily favoured Birstall.

After patient wide play by Cardell Lubban and Joe Meakin, who both began sharply, the latter’s deep low cross eventually found its way to Jurgen Charlesworthand, after one touch to set himself, fired a snapped volley toward goal that, through a number of congregated players, nestled in the right-hand corner past the stranded Shilliam for 1-0, arguably against the run of play.

Despite being a goal down, Birstall were positive when driving forward. They continued with their nimble football and their intentions were commendable and may have equalised a few minutes after going behind, but Michael Paparozzi’s effort was thwarted by the resilient visiting rearguard. Moments earlier, Charlesworth had a chance to double his personal tally, but his curling effort was well wide.

However, on 38 minutes and Birstall had their two best chances of the half to equalise, both within minutes of each other. Mitch Williams found himself in acres on the left when in behind Joe Evans, but failed to hit his effort on target as his shot was dragged well wide under no real pressure. 3 minutes later, in a similar build-up, Alex Johnson found himself one-on-one with Heltorp, but the ‘keeper fantastically anticipated the scooped finish and parried away before the danger was eventually cleared.

Gedling started the second half well looking to build on their lead, but ultimately both sets of defensive stalwarts were proving tough nuts to crack. Lubban and Charlesworth continued to tirelessly run the channels as their respective opposing full-backs, Dominic Watts and Jack Green, began to struggle defensively and, rather unsurprisingly, 10 minutes after the restart and Gedling had doubled their lead.

After a superb switch-of-play from Martin Holt, excellent all game, Meakin found himself in an unnatural left wing position, though his tricky wing play caused troubles for Green and his powerful low cross evaded everyone before Ryan Plummers tapped the ball home into the roof of the net as the travellers erupted in delight.

To their credit, Birstall still continued to play their fine-flowing football and were a delight to watch in places. But in fairness, not much was going to penetrate the strength of Gedling’s defensive back line on the day, typically lead by a man of the match performance from Brett. At the other end, Lubban, after a back header from Green to Shilliam fell short, nipped to intercept the pass but his lobbed effort fell the wrong side of the crossbar from a Gedling perspective.

Predictably, Birstall ended the final 15 minutes on top as they sought looking for a way back into the affair. They went closest to reducing the arrears on 76 minutes, but Charlie Roberts finely anticipated a low drive from Lewis Dodds and cleared well off the line after Heltorp was beaten. This was their best chance back into a game that was really out of Birstall’s grasp. Their reluctance to deliver crosses into Gedling’s box when the opportunity arose really was their Achilles heel, and, although neat, their possession and build-up play ultimately played into the hands of Gedling as they dealt with everything in front of them with minimal difficulty.

In the final minute of play, Gedling could have made it 3, but after a fine Ross McCaughey corner, Carl Westcarr was deemed offside by the far-sided official before he prodded home into an open goal amidst a scramble. However, the game was sealed as Gedling chalked off another fine away performance for one of their best results against a very well organised Birstall side.

A team is often assessed in their next game following a defeat the previous week and Gedling showed exemplary resolve and bouncebackability to secure an immense result away from home. They have showed that they have adopted a phenomenal footballing mindset under the stewardship of Stuart Robinson and Chris Marks, and could find themselves challenging for silverware come May.

They are back on the road again next week in the second of three away games in Leicestershire. They visit Barrow Town next Saturday (4th November) with a 3pm kick off.

Gedling Miners Welfare Man of the Match – Steven Brett

Match Attendance – 43

Birstall United – Elliot Shilliam, Jack Green, Dominic Watts, Joe Shaw, James Dodds, Charlie Young, Lewis Dodds (c), Michael Paparozzi (Jake Robertson 64’), Mitch Williams, Alex Johnson (Aaron Headley 72’), Ash Way.
Unused Substitutions – Aaron Shilliam, Thomas Burton, Reif Armstrong.
Cautions – Dodds (foul 24’), Watts (foul 44’), Green (dissent 75’)

Gedling Miners Welfare – Chris Heltorp, Joe Evans (Charlie Roberts 61’), Ross McCaughey, Steven Brett, Martin Holt, Jay Knight, Jurgen Charlesworth, Jimmy Spiers, Ryan Plummer, Joe Meakin, Cardell Lubban (Carl Westcarr 67’).
Unused Substitutions – Keaton Sharpe, Carey Knight.

Cautions – N/A

Thief targeting elderly people in Carlton

0

Elderly residents in Carlton are being warned to be on their guard after reports of a man approaching older people for change and then stealing money.

On Saturday (October 28), an 85-year-old man had money taken from him at an address in Carlton.

The following day, also in Carlton, an 87-year-old woman managed to push a man away after he attempted to distract her; a member of the public then gave chase.

Officers say the offender is thought to be an Eastern European male, aged between 27-30 years, between 5″6 and 5″9 tall, slim build, short dark hair & spoke with an accent.

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police said: “Please be aware that a couple of incidents have occurred in the Carlton area where elderly persons were approached by male asking for change and have had cash stolen from them.

“Please be vigilant, protect your belongings by not having them on public display and report any suspicious behaviour to police. Please pass this message onto your elderly relatives.”

Police have issued the following tips to avoid becoming a victim to street crime:

  • Remember – be aware of your surroundings. Concentrate on what and who is around you. Don’t be distracted by using mobile gadgets and MP3 players. If you are listening to music, use just one headphone so that you are aware of someone approaching you.
  • Don’t give thieves the chance to take your valuables from you. Don’t put them on show.
  • Don’t leave your bag, wallet, valuable jewellery, mobile phone or MP3 player on display to thieves.
  • If someone tries to take something from you by force, it may be best to give it to them. This will help you avoid getting injured.
  • Don’t leave bags or pockets open or unzipped. It’s easier for a thief to dip into an open bag. Purse bells are a great way of further protecting your purse.

Delight as new play park unveiled in Woodborough

0

A £100k new play park has been unveiled in Woodborough after several years of hard work and efforts by a dedicated group of volunteers.

Crowds gathered to watch the official opening of new park on The Governors’ Field by multi-gold-winning paralympian Richard Whitehead MBE.

Mark Spencer MP, Councillor Boyd Elliott and Councillor Helen Greensmith were also in attendance.

The completed park was the result of two years of hard work by Woodborough GREAT – an action group made up of volunteers from the local community with the aim of finding the funds to get the project off the ground.

HAVING FUN: Children enjoying the park pose with members of the GREAT team at the opening event

The majority of the funding for the new play area came from WREN – a not-for-profit organisation that awards grants for community projects using funds donated by FCC Environment through the Landfill Communities Fund.

Money was also contributed by Nottinghamshire County Council, Woodborough Parish Council and the Samuel Eden Trust.

The GREAT team also made some personal donations and money was also raised in the community at the village street market and a Christmas Quiz.

Anthony Scarborough, a member of the GREAT group hailed the day as a fantastic success.

He said:  “We had over 300 visitors at the opening event and handed out over 200 goodie bags which were donated by HAGS – the park play equipment provider.”

Scammers praying on jobseekers in borough with fake ads

0

Fraudsters are setting up fake job adverts online in order to lure in unsuspecting jobseekers from across the borough, experts have warned.

Action Fraud has received intelligence that suggests fraudsters are advertising fake sales roles on job vacancy websites in the hope of attracting unsuspecting jobseekers.

Once a jobseeker has shown interest, the fraudsters tell them they will be selling goods on the company’s behalf; often the goods are cars or machinery but they could be anything. Jobseekers are instructed that they must use their own personal pre-existing bank accounts and payment methods, as well as their own online marketplace accounts.

The fraudsters usually give a vague excuse as to why a business account or login is not available. Jobseekers are then sent photos and information of the products they will be selling (which do not exist) in order to create an attractive advert to entice the primary victim; the buyer of the goods.

job-search
JOBSEEKERS: Fraudsters are targeting those looking for work

Once the victim has transferred their money to a bogus escrow provider, no goods are ever received and all contact is broken off.

This leads to a financial loss for the buyer of the goods as nothing is ever received. Likewise, the recruited jobseeker receives none of the promised payment for their work as originally detailed in the bogus advert.

How can jobseekers protect themselves?

  • Don’t assume advertised vacancies have been verified by the website or classified advertisement sites upon which they feature. If you suspect a job vacancy to be fraudulent, be sure to notify the website via their reporting/flag functions. Doing so prevents others from becoming victims of fraud and helps organisations and law enforcement tackle and disrupt fraudulent activity.
  • Although many legitimate job vacancies are internet based sales roles, those which are vague about the business, product type, sales method or sales platform to be used should be approached with caution. It is always good practice to conduct further enquiries about an advertised role.
  • Genuine businesses would never ask you to use your personal bank or online payment accounts to facilitate business transactions, nor would they ask to utilise your personal online marketplace account in order to sell their products. If someone claiming to represent the organisation suggests you do this or asks for your personal details so they can use your account(s) themselves, sever contact
  • Get more advice and support from SaferJobs.

The John Illsley Band at Lowdham Village Hall: Review

‘Folks always ask us how we get artists like this to a village hall,’ commented promoter Mike Hoare when introducing the John Illsley Band. ‘Well on this occasion I can tell you it was down to Andy Fairweather Low’s tour manager who told John he should do it.’ A fine recommendation, with Illsley himself later affirming, ‘You must be one of the best audiences we’ve played to!’

Illsley being a co-founder of Dire Straits alongside Mark Knopfler and with the group not reforming any time soon, the John Illsley Band is the next best thing.  Launching into Strait’s classics Walk Of Life and Espresso Love, the band immediately had fans onside.

This was very much an authentic reproduction of Dire Straits music rather than tribute. Looking regal and resplendent, centre stage in his crisp white shirt, Illsley exuded charisma as he led the ensemble through a raft of Straits numbers: Private Investigations, Romeo And Juliet, Lady Writer, and, Tunnel Of Love. With Paul Stacey and Robbie McIntosh sharing duties on guitar recreating the unique Straits sound, Jess Greenfield both added presence and an extra dimension with her backing vocals. The line up was completed by Steve Smith (keyboards) and Stuart Ross (drums) and what a tight unit it was.

To the adulation of the crowd, the hits just kept coming. Sultans Of Swing closing the first half saw a standing ovation. Something previous unseen in a Lowdham Village Hall gig. However, when Money For Nothing closed the show, the roof really was raised! There was no way that Illsley and co would get away without returning to the stage for an encore.

The show wasn’t all about Dire Straits. Illsley has his own catalogue. Streets Of Heaven, a love song written for his wife, contrasted with politically inspired Ship Of Fools commenting on Blair’s and Bush’s legacy to world peace (or not). Railway Tracks illustrated how life isn’t always straight forwards and when the band played Long Shadow, Illsley emphasised that, whilst he relished having been in Dire Straits and still loved to play their songs, he was always looking to move forwards and create new material.

The Illsley Band encore was worth the entry fee in itself lasting over 20 minutes. The atmospheric Brothers In Arms, ‘a very important song for the band,’ was followed by The Bug, and, Where Do You Think You’re Going. The group doesn’t usually do village halls but from this reception here I think they may well be back!

Netherfield residents to have brush with fame

0

A selection of Netherfield’s most colourful characters are to appear in a Nottingham art exhibition next month after being captured on canvas by a talented artist.

Local artist Dominick Cuming has spent the past two years painting the portraits of people living in Lily Avenue.

And now after competing a staggering 28 portraits of people living on the street, Dominick is now planning to showcase them together for the first time this November at Nottingham Society of Artists Gallery in Nottingham.

As well as their portraits, a short biography about each of the residents featured will also be displayed at the exhibition to help bring the community alive to those living outside the area.

TALENT: A selection of some of the portraits of people living in Lily Avenue

Dominick told Gedling Eye that he’d never originally planned to paint everyone in the street.

“It was just something that seems to have grown and grown by itself,” he said.

“I first painted the portraits of a family who live on the street and was then asked to paint one for a neighbour for her birthday. The neighbour’s friend then saw it and asked me to do one for her and then also one for her friend; I’ve now painted a portrait for everyone in the whole street.

“I think it’s great that we’re holding an exhibition of jolly old ‘Nevo’ in such a good gallery in the middle of the City.”

ON DISPLAY: Some of the portraits of Netherfield residents featured in the exhibition

When asked to name his favourite portrait that will be on show, Dominick chose the portrait of ‘Eileen’, as he thinks it’s the most fun.

FAVOURITE: Eileen is pictured with a cigarette

The exhibition will open to the public on Tuesday, November 14, but local residents from Lily Avenue can get a sneak peek at the collection between 6pm-8pm on the same night at a private viewing where free wine will also be on offer.

The exhibition runs from Tuesday, November 14 to Sunday 19th and will be open between 12pm-5pm Tuesday to Saturday and 10am-12.30pm on the Sunday

Arnold Market purchase plan announced by Gedling Borough Council

1

Gedling Borough Council has today announced they plan to buy back Arnold Market.

Council cabinet members are expected to recommend the full council approves plans to purchase the town’s market and help maximise its impact.

Talks between the owner and the council have been ongoing since the early part of the year and have advanced to the point that councillors will be asked to approve the purchase of the market at the next Full Council meeting on 15 November.

Arnold_Market
PLANS: The market as it stands today in Arnold town centre

The council’s future plans for the market will include improving its appearance, increasing the use for community events and activities and working with market traders to widen and increase the choice of goods and services.

Leader of the Council, Councillor John Clarke said: “We have had some very positive discussions with the land owner and we are near to an agreement to purchase the market and bring it into council ownership. The owners share our vision to maximise the impact of the market and are as committed as we are to improving it for the benefit of Arnold.

We will have more details in the coming months but this is great news, another significant step forward and will be welcomed by residents, businesses and existing market traders. We look forward to making this a real success for Arnold and for the borough.”

Bonfire waste warning to Gedling borough residents

0

People in Gedling borough planning bonfires next month are being reminded it’s illegal to burn many types of waste.

Those caught burning illegal waste like treated wood, tyres, plastics, rubber and oil could face a fine of up to £50,000, the Environment Agency has today warned.

Organisers are now being asked to be vigilant about the materials deposited on their bonfire, while preventing others from dumping illegal waste on them by keeping the location secure.

People will also use Bonfire night as an excuse to burn old furniture, mattresses or even household rubbish.

Organisers and households should only burn clean, non-commercial waste, so if you’re organising a bonfire night make sure you know where the bonfire material has come from and that it is suitable.

People face a fine of up to £50,000 for illegally managing waste. More information and guidance on materials which are safe to burn on a bonfire and further information for organisers of bonfire and firework events can be found on the GOV.UK website.

If the Environment Agency suspects illegal waste is to be burnt at an event, or there is a harm to the environment, they are able to issue a stop notice which will prevent an event from taking place.

Marc Lidderth, Environment Manager in the West Midlands, said: “We want people to enjoy themselves but the uncontrolled and excessive burning of the wrong waste can cause pollution and damage people’s health.

“We encourage people to make sure they dispose of their waste legally and safely, and be aware that their community bonfire could be targeted by unscrupulous waste businesses who want to find somewhere to dispose of waste, resulting in the illegal burning of commercial waste.

Organisers should ensure that they know where the bonfire material has come from and it is suitable. If anyone sees any suspicious activities they should contact us on 0800 807060 or report it anonymously to Crimestoppers.

Don’t let Hallowe’en turn into legal ‘fright night’

0

Hallowe’en is generally a ‘spooktacular’ time for all but a few bad apples can spoil the fun.

So what can you do if someone chooses to play a trick and damages your property? And can you intervene to stop property damage? Are you responsible if a child is allergic to the sweets you gave them?

Simon Roberts of DAS Law has the answers to these questions and others to avoid making this Halloween a truly blood-curdling event.

If a child damages your property with a ‘trick’, can you recover repair costs from the parents?

Damage to property is potentially a criminal offence as well as a civil matter. Halloween is a busy time for the police and they may receive a high volume of calls, so before contacting them consider whether the matter can be resolved amicably. However, if you are harassed and concerned about your safety then you should contact the police.

Generally speaking, parents are responsible for supervising their children but are not liable for the acts of their children and cannot be directly responsible for damage they may cause to your property. So you would ordinarily have to take civil action against the child as there is no minimum age at which a child can be held to be negligent – this would entirely depend on the circumstances and their understanding. But this may not be a realistic way forward as a child is unlikely to have assets to pursue for damages, so it would be preferable to hold the parents responsible if possible.

Parents are responsible for ensuring their children are supervised in certain circumstances, although this will vary depending their age i.e. older children are less likely to require supervision as they will have a greater responsibility for their own actions. Therefore, the other option is to consider would be whether it may be possible to sue the parents in negligence for failing to supervise or, if they did supervise at the time, for failing to control their children. This, of course, would be dependent on proving the elements of negligence.

EXPERT: Simon Roberts from DAS Law

How far are you allowed to go to stop a child from playing ‘tricks’ on you and your property?

A landowner is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of their land and to protection from any unlawful interference with their use or enjoyment of it. If you are in fear for your safety and/or harassed, then you should contact the police as these are criminal matters. From a civil point of view, it could be argued that a regular stream of people invading your property whilst ‘trick or treating’ would amount to a legal nuisance.

Normally, you could look at legal action and remedies such as damages and an injunction. If nuisance is proved, a key question would be who could an injunction be taken out against? Due to the transient nature of the nuisance, it would be difficult to bring a claim against a one-time offender as would be the case with Halloween. However, if someone persistently posed a nuisance, then it would be more likely to succeed in a claim against them for trespass or nuisance.

I would advise against any physical interactions and, as above, if the situation escalates you should report the matter to the police.

What can you threaten or can you physically intervene if an act of vandalism is taking place on your property by a minor?

Any damage to property is potentially a criminal offence and you could threaten to report the perpetrator to the police. Further, you could also seek to take a civil claim for damages to compensate you and put you back in the position you were before the damage.

I would advise against any physical interactions as the situation could escalate. If you assault a child, this could be reported to the police and it may be difficult to justify whether this response was reasonable in the circumstances and you could risk criminal sanctions.

If you give a child sweets for Hallowe’en and they choke or have an allergic reaction, are you responsible?

This would of course depend on the circumstances. Assuming the sweets have not been interfered with, a claimant would have to prove you have been negligent in order to hold you responsible for any injuries. To establish negligence the court will look at whether the defendant owed the claimant a duty of care, there has been a breach of that duty and this has caused the claimant loss. The loss must also be foreseeable.

In practical terms it may be difficult to establish negligence if you simply gave a child a sweet and they choked as this could be down to any number of reasons, for example, the child’s own behaviour contributing to the incident. The child would be assuming a certain level of risk and therefore, if any claims were brought, you would look to argue either a voluntary assumption of risk and/or contributory negligence as a defence. However, the circumstances may be different if you gave a baby or toddler sweets as they may be less likely to detect certain dangers so extra care should be taken

Hopeful models in borough warned of recruitment scam

0

Local police officers have shared a warning about a latest scam which involves fraudsters trying to dupe people around the borough into believing they are recruiting models.

The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) and Action Fraud have recently noticed that scammers have been setting up fake adverts on social media platforms – including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp – as well as job browsing websites.

Once victims show an interest in the job, the fraudsters contactthem on the false promise of a modelling career and subsequently advise the victims to come in for a test shoot.

The fraud can then potentially be carried out in two ways.

Firstly, the fraudsters can pressurise the victims in sending an upfront fee to book a slot for the test shoot. Once they have received the upfront fee, the victim will never hear from the fraudsters again.

The second possible method is that the fraudsters will take the advance fee that the victim sends for a photo shoot and arrange a photo shoot with the victim. After the photo shoot, the fraudsters will contact the victim after a few days and convince them that their shoot was successful and offer them a job as a model. The victim will then be asked to sign a contract and pay another upfront fee, usually to secure the modelling contract.

Fraudsters are also creating fake adverts for supposed modelling opportunities for children which do not exist. Fraudsters will inform parents or guardians that a potential career in modelling awaits their child. This tactic convinces the parent or guardian to sign up their child and send an advance fee.

The suspects will also convince the victim that in order to become a model, they will need to have a portfolio. The fraudsters will recommend a number of packages and stress that if a package is not paid for in advance, the process of becoming a model cannot continue.

Over a two year period (September 2015 – August 2017), an average of 28 reports of advance fee modelling frauds have been received per month by the NFIB. In August 2017, 49 Action Fraud reports of this fraud type were received and may continue to rise. The total loss in August 2017 alone was over £71,000.
Tips for staying safe:

  • Carry out your own research prior to paying any type of advance or upfront fee.
  • Be wary if you are asked to pay for a portfolio, as many legitimate agencies will cover that cost.
  • Don’t give your bank account details or sensitive information to anyone without carrying out your own research on the relevant agency.
  • If you have been affected by this, or any other type of fraud, report it to Action Fraud by visiting www.actionfraud.police.uk or by calling 0300 123 2040.