Wednesday, May 21, 2025
19.3 C
Gedling

Top Wighay council offices in Linby ‘should be scrapped’ to create £20.5m roads cash, say independent councillors

The Independent Alliance want to scrap the controversial new £15.7m offices in favour of pumping cash into road repairs.

Bookmark

Get breaking news and a daily update sent to your WhatsApp by signing up HERE

Independent councillors at Nottinghamshire County Council say they would scrap the council’s new £15.7m Top Wighay office development in Linby to pay for county roads repairs if they were in charge of finances.

The Independent Alliance opposition group will propose an alternative budget on Thursday (February 9) when the authority meets to approve financial papers for the next three years.

The group has met with finance bosses over the past month to pull together the plans and its documents have been signed off as “legal and balanced”.

Council offices Top Wighay Farm
PICTURED: AN artist’s impression of the new council building at Top Wighay Fam near Linby
Top Wighay Farm Linby
PICTURED: (L-R) Cllr Keith Girling – chairman of Economic Development, Matt Neale – service director Growth and Investment and Steve Keating at the site of the new offices
Victoria Road Netherfield pothole
The Independent Alliance say the cash could be spent on repairing potholes

The plans include scrapping the controversial new £15.7m offices in favour of pumping cash into road repairs.

- Advertisement -

Responding to the plans, the council’s leading Conservative group dismissed them as “gimmick proposals”.

The Independent Alliance group says about £11.5m would be saved by dropping the new building, due to be built at Top Wighay Farm in Linby, but £4.2m would be lost to “abortive costs”.

The savings would be moved into immediate highway works for the 2023/24 financial year to tackle an issue some councillors have said is the most frequent complaint from members of the public.

This would be coupled with a further £9m for roads already allocated across the following three financial years, which would be brought forward into 2023/24.

The group says the £20.5m total allocation for roads would then be split by each district and borough to deliver £2.928m of repairs in each area next year.

- Advertisement -

Other proposals include reductions in the communications and marketing team and scrapping all unfilled vacant job postings.

This would save £670,000, which would be moved into the highways team to create staff for extra road maintenance.

And the group is proposing keeping councillors’ divisional funds at £5,000 rather than the Conservative Group’s planned reduction to £3,000.

These funds are allocated per councillor for community projects in their area.

Scrapping the £2,000 reduction would cost £132,000, with this cash found through contingency cash and an increased number of homes paying council tax.

- Advertisement -

The proposed 4.84 per cent council tax increase put forward by the Conservatives would still be enforced under the Independents’ plans.

Cllr Francis Purdue-Horan (Ind), who will propose the plans, said: “It’s a legal budget and will be paid for by scrapping an office block we don’t need and bringing forward spending.

“It will be fairly allocated and deals with the biggest problem residents get in touch with us about.

“Ask anybody what they think about the state of our roads and pavements and they’ll tell you they’re diabolical.

“This budget amendment shows we’re listening and acting on residents’ concerns.”

Cllr Lee Waters (Ash Ind), who will second the plans, added: “We’ve told Conservatives time and time again we don’t need new offices at Top Wighay.

“Since Covid, working habits have changed forever yet the council thinks it’s a good idea to build new offices.

“For me, a balanced, legal budget which fixes our broken roads and pavements is a no-brainer.”

Commenting on the Independents’ budget plans, Cllr Richard Jackson (Con), cabinet member for finance, said it is full of “impractical gimmick proposals”.

He says the authority’s communications department does an “incredibly important job keeping the council in touch with the people we serve”.

His planned reduction in divisional funds will “provide more support to our most vulnerable residents through other channels”, he added.

He also described highway spending as a “tired old gimmick” which would “jeopardise the funding available” for major infrastructure projects.

And on the Top Wighay proposal, he said the new building will be energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, saving taxpayers £1.35m a year.

“Not so long ago, Ashfield Independents were complaining Nottinghamshire County Council was too remote from Ashfield and even walked to County Hall to make their point,” he said.

“Yet now, they oppose our plans to build an important new Nottinghamshire County Council office on their doorstep.”

He added: “[This] alternative budget …  is just another small bundle of gestures and soundbites designed to get their picture in the papers.

“The budget proposed by the Conservatives is designed to provide sustainable, good-quality services for the next three years and beyond.”

The Labour Group has confirmed it will not be putting forward alternative budget documents and will likely not support the Independents’ plans.

Spotted something? Got a story? Email our newsdesk news@gedlingeye.co.uk

Read more from Gedling Eye

Get your daily news briefing every evening…

Sign up for our daily news email and receive Gedling borough news direct to your email inbox in the early evening, to read at your leisure on your desktop, tablet or mobile wherever you are.

We don’t spam and you'll only receive one email a day

Join the discussion

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Most read