Nottingham City Council call for expansion of city boundaries

Loxley_House

Plans put forward by the Conservative-run Nottinghamshire County Council would involve dissolving all district and borough councils, and the county council itself, and setting up one or two ‘super councils’ covering all of the county, excluding the city.

But now, the Labour-run city council has called the super-council plan “incomplete” and a “huge missed opportunity”.

It said the plan has ignored the city altogether, and that Nottingham is already disadvantaged by having among the tightest boundaries of any city in the country.

The county’s proposals would compound this problem by creating a super-council that boxes in the city, according to the city council.

The leader of the city council, Jon Collins, has previously said he thinks the city’s boundaries should include parts of West Bridgford, Stapleford, Gedling, and Arnold.

The city council was responding to the county council’s consultation on setting up a ‘super council’, which ends this week.

Supporters of the super council plan say it could save around £20 to £30 million a year, streamline council services and protect front-line spending.

Currently, the city council says less than half (48.7 percent) of those who work in the city also live in the city – significantly less than for other comparable cities such as Sheffield (75.7 percent) and Leeds (70.5 percent.)



It argues many people from outside the city make use of city services and its infrastructure and enjoy it as a destination for leisure, entertainment and shopping.

But their council tax doesn’t contribute to funding the city services they use regularly and they are not in a position to hold Nottingham’s decision makers to account for choices made in the city that can significantly affect their daily lives.

The city council argues that including an expanded city would bring benefits for the whole area – pointing to Government acknowledgement that it is thriving cities which increasingly drive the country’s economy and that of the areas surrounding them.

It said many areas outside the current city council boundaries are recognisably part of the urban conurbation and are places where many people who work in Nottingham live.

Any new unitary authority – which would have transport, infrastructure and economic responsibilities – should reflect those boundaries which are the norm for the vast majority of the rest of the country and the world, the council said.

Councillor Jon Collins is the leader of the city council, and represents the St Ann’s ward for Labour.

He said: “We don’t think local government reorganisation is a good thing to happen now or the most pressing thing in local government. But we do think that if the county council wants to press ahead with its proposals for a unitary council surrounding the city, then it should absolutely be considering the future role and size of the city.

“The existing boundary between Nottingham and Nottinghamshire is an nonsensical anomaly from the 1998 local government reorganisation, leaving Nottingham at a disadvantage over other cities.

“Any local government reorganisation needs to be sustainable and future-proof and that should include a single council that serves the whole of urban Nottingham.

“Proposals based only on the county boundary would stifle Nottingham and Nottinghamshire’s potential growth and reduce accountability for city services.

“A new large county unitary’s focus would be diluted if it was trying to deliver services to former coalfields and growing market towns as well as fulfilling metropolitan duties in an arbitrary ring around Nottingham.”

People can have their say on the super council plan here:  http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/local/future-nottinghamshire

1 Comment

  1. Nottingham City Boundary provides free Healthcare, policing, transport, education as well as attracting visitors and commuters every day from the boroughs of Gedling, Broxtowe, Rushcliffe and Ashfield.

    If Nottingham simply did not exist then these boroughs would be seeking help from a failing Hospital, bad college opportunities and virtually a non influential image on the international business scene.

    I personally hope that Nottingham does adopt the four boroughs as part of the city and then the city and county can compete in terms of investment with Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester and take its rightful place as a top 5 city destination for business and opportunities.

    The city would be able to gain more budgets and make small towns centers into very popular centers as well as open up a number of projects for business and protection opportunities.

    The Radcliffe Counsellor wants to send the county backwards in terms of development by creating a super council that will exclude the only real thing that gives the county its name and that is the City of Nottingham. That is a very dangerous game and if the Radcliffe counsellor gets her target then the entire county will lose popularity and could really suffer post a UK-Brexit period in which we need to gain international investors as they would overlook the entire county and focus more on West and South Yorkshire, a unified Leicestershire and the West Midlands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.